Military appeals court lets 9/11 plea deals proceed after defense secretary moves to rescind them

May Be Interested In:Bella Hadid puts on a chic display in edgy black jacket and silken skirt in NYC


A U.S. military court on Monday upheld a judge’s ruling that said Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin acted improperly this year when he invalidated plea agreements for three men accused of planning the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The Court of Military Commission Review heard an appeal that sought to preserve Austin’s move in August to unravel the plea deals with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi. The agreements allow the defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges that would prevent them from receiving the death penalty.

Guantanamo detainees, from left, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.AP;

The three-judge panel concluded that Austin did not have the authority to back out of deals implemented by Susan Escallier, the convening authority for military commissions appointed by the defense secretary last year who worked to negotiate the agreements.

The court said the defense secretary improperly rescinded the deals after the pretrial agreements were already underway.

Chief Judge Lisa M. Schenck wrote in her opinion, with the two other judges concurring, that Austin’s intervention in existing pretrial agreements was “without precedent.”

The Defense Department did not provide a comment on the ruling Tuesday.

The ruling affirms a lower court’s finding last month that the three defendants should be allowed to move forward with their plea deals. All three stand accused of aiding, abetting and conspiring to carry out the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and other sites.

The ruling noted that lawyers informed the court of the plea deals Aug. 1. The next day, Austin withdrew Escallier’s authority to make such an agreement.

“Responsibility for such a decision should rest with me,” Austin said at the time.

The court said that it would be unjust and outside the bounds of his authority for Austin to dismantle such a deal retroactively. It said the existence of a convening authority who can negotiate plea deals — in this case, Escallier — and a boss who can unravel them is not supported under military justice.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Bigg Boss 18: Edin Rose, Yamini Malhotra eliminated in double eviction, fans say 'inko pehle din hi nikaal dena tha'
Bigg Boss 18: Edin Rose, Yamini Malhotra eliminated in double eviction, fans say ‘inko pehle din hi nikaal dena tha’
Rat cake
From pickle everything to rat cakes, expect these food trends in 2025
Mom, the Phone Bill’s Due—Does That Include Snooping Rights?
Mom, the Phone Bill’s Due—Does That Include Snooping Rights?
This Shah Rukh Khan’s movie featuring 2 famous actresses earned Rs 191 crore, but was still considered a flop
Total Eclipse To Saturn’s ‘Disappearing’ Rings: List of astronomical events to watch out in 2025
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social Media
‘The View’ Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov’t Won’t Regulate Social Media
Steve Smith hits a cover drive
Australia vs India cricket: Steve Smith’s best shots of century
Real News, Real People: Impactful Stories of Today | © 2024 | Daily News